On the effects of spatial resolution on effective distance measurement in digital landscapes

Ecological Processes

Takeshi Shirabe¹  Rachel Mundeli Murekatete² 

[1] KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Teknikringen 10A, 114 28, Stockholm, Sweden;KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Teknikringen 10A, 114 28, Stockholm, Sweden;University of Rwanda, College of Science and Technology, Centre for Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing, KN 67 Street Nyarugenge, Kigali, Rwanda;

关键词: Landscape connectivity;    Effective distance;    Raster-based least-cost path model;    Accuracy;    Spatial resolution;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13717-021-00296-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundConnectivity is an important landscape attribute in ecological studies and conservation practices and is often expressed in terms of effective distance. If the cost of movement of an organism over a landscape is effectively represented by a raster surface, effective distances can be equated with the cost-weighted distance of least-cost paths. It is generally recognized that this measure is sensitive to the grid’s cell size, but little is known if it is always sensitive in the same way and to the same degree and if not, what makes it more (or less) sensitive. We conducted computational experiments with both synthetic and real landscape data, in which we generated and analyzed large samples of effective distances measured on cost surfaces of varying cell sizes derived from those data. The particular focus was on the statistical behavior of the ratio—referred to as ‘accuracy indicator’—of the effective distance measured on a lower-resolution cost surface to that measured on a higher-resolution cost surface.ResultsIn the experiment with synthetic cost surfaces, the sample values of the accuracy indicator were generally clustered around 1, but slightly greater with the absence of linear sequences (or barriers) of high-cost or inadmissible cells and smaller with the presence of such sequences. The latter tendency was more dominant, and both tendencies became more pronounced as the difference between the spatial resolutions of the associated cost surfaces increased. When two real satellite images (of different resolutions with fairly large discrepancies) were used as the basis of cost estimation, the variation of the accuracy indicator was found to be substantially large in the vicinity (1500 m) of the source but decreases quickly with an increase in distance from it.ConclusionsEffective distances measured on lower-resolution cost surfaces are generally highly correlated with—and useful predictors of—effective distances measured on higher-resolution cost surfaces. This relationship tends to be weakened when linear barriers to dispersal (e.g., roads and rivers) exist, but strengthened when moving away from sources of dispersal and/or when linear barriers (if any) are detected by other presumably more accessible and affordable sources such as vector line data. Thus, if benefits of high-resolution data are not likely to substantially outweigh their costs, the use of lower resolution data is worth considering as a cost-effective alternative in the application of least-cost path modeling to landscape connectivity analysis.

【 授权许可】

CC BY