Movement syndromes of a Neotropical frugivorous bat inhabiting heterogeneous landscapes in Brazil

Movement Ecology

Patricia Kerches-Rogeri¹  Márcio Silva Araújo¹  Rafael Souza Cruz Alves¹  Milton Cezar Ribeiro¹  Danielle Leal Ramos¹  Camila Fátima Priante¹  Beatriz de Oliveira Teles¹  Otso Ovaskainen²  Jukka Siren³ 

[1]Departamento de Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Avenida 24 A,1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil

[2]Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

[3]Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway

[4]Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

[5]Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland

关键词: Movement behavior;    Diffusion model;    Individual specialization;    Habitat fragmentation;    Frugivory;    Phyllostomidae;    Seed dispersal;    Space use;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40462-021-00266-6

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThere is growing evidence that individuals within populations can vary in both habitat use and movement behavior, but it is still not clear how these two relate to each other. The aim of this study was to test if and how individual bats in a Stunira lilium population differ in their movement activity and preferences for landscape features in a correlated manner.MethodsWe collected data on movements of 27 individuals using radio telemetry. We fitted a heterogeneous-space diffusion model to the movement data in order to evaluate signals of movement variation among individuals.ResultsS. lilium individuals generally preferred open habitat with Solanum fruits, regularly switched between forest and open areas, and showed high site fidelity. Movement variation among individuals could be summarized in four movement syndromes: (1) average individuals, (2) forest specialists, (3) explorers which prefer Piper, and (4) open area specialists which prefer Solanum and Cecropia.ConclusionsIndividual preferences for landscape features plus food resource and movement activity were correlated, resulting in different movement syndromes. Individual variation in preferences for landscape elements and food resources highlight the importance of incorporating explicitly the interaction between landscape structure and individual heterogeneity in descriptions of animal movement.

【 授权许可】

CC BY