期刊论文详细信息
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Gabapentin as an adjuvant therapy to splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
article
Ahmed, Ahmed M.1  Hassan, Osama G.2  Khalifa, Ahmed A.1 
[1] Orthopedic and Traumatolgy Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley University;General Surgery Department, Qena Faculty Of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley University
关键词: Gabapentin;    Splinting;    Carpal tunnel syndrome;    Systematic review;    Meta-analysis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s41983-020-00237-5
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common upper limb entrapment neuropathy; severe cases are treated surgically and mild to moderate can be managed conservatively. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to define the efficacy of gabapentin as an adjuvant to splinting in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS. A systematic search through 13 databases, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the use of gabapentin with splinting in CTS were included and analyzed. Three RCTs including 170 patients were eligible. There was no significant difference between gabapentin plus splinting and splinting alone in 5 measured parameters: (1) Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) [MD (95% CI) = − 0.76 (− 2.46–0.93), p = 0.378], (2) Functional Status Scale (FSS) [MD (95% CI) = − 0.23 (− 1.40–0.94), p = 0.701], (3) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain [MD (95% CI) = − 0.6 (− 1.47–0.27), p = 0.174], (4) Grip strength [MD (95% CI) = − 0.11 (− 0.70–0.48), p = 0.718], and (5) pinch strength [MD (95% CI) = 0.72 (− 0.10–1.54), p = 0.083]. This review provides low-quality evidence that gabapentin plus nocturnal splinting is not superior to splinting alone. More high-quality trials are needed to determine the role of this drug as an adjuvant in the management of CTS.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202108090004680ZK.pdf 2043KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:0次