An Audit of CT Chest Reports and Their Potential Impact on the Workup of Patients with Suspected Lung Cancer

Canadian Respiratory Journal

article

Andrew Weinstock¹  Luke Jeagal¹  Chantal Savard²  Jana Taylor³  Anne V. Gonzalez¹ 

[1]Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute

[2]Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Centre

[3]Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre

DOI  :  10.1155/2021/6647087

学科分类：工程和技术（综合）

来源: Hindawi Publishing Corporation

【 摘 要 】

Background . Quality gaps exist in the diagnostic evaluation of lung cancer patients. The initial CT chest guides the workup of patients with suspected lung cancer. We sought to determine how frequently CT reports provided guideline-concordant recommendations with regard to additional imaging studies and/or invasive diagnostic procedures . Methods . This was a retrospective study. The records of patients referred for investigation of suspected lung cancer between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016, were reviewed. Patients with confirmed lung cancer, for whom CT scan images and reports were available, are included. CT reports were reviewed, with attention to additional imaging studies and/or invasive diagnostic procedures suggested. These recommendations were examined against current guidelines for lung cancer diagnosis and staging, based on suspected disease stage. Results . One hundred forty-six patients are included in the analysis. Most patients were diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 63% had advanced disease (stages III and IV). Only 12% of CT reports contained guideline-concordant recommendations for additional imaging studies, with PET scan suggested in only 6% of reports. Potential invasive diagnostic procedures were suggested in one fifth of CT reports, and only 58% of these recommendations were in keeping with current guidelines. In particular, transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) was suggested in 26% of patients despite advanced stage disease. Conclusion . Guideline-concordant recommendations for investigation of suspected lung cancer are rarely available on CT reports. This is true with respect to both imaging studies and invasive diagnostic procedures. Incorporation of more evidence-based suggestions may reduce quality gaps in lung cancer diagnosis and staging.

【 授权许可】

CC BY