Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres – a cross-sectional fidelity-based study

BMC Psychiatry

Lars Hestmark¹  Maria Romøren¹  Reidar Pedersen¹  Kristiane Myckland Hansson¹  Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang²  Torleif Ruud³ 

[1] Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway;Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway;Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1474, Nordbyhagen, Norway;Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway;Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1474, Nordbyhagen, Norway;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;

关键词: Family involvement;    Psychotic disorders;    Mental health services research;    Schizophrenia;    Family psychoeducation;    Fidelity scale;    Implementation science;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12888-021-03300-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundFamily involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is supported by scientific evidence, as well as legal and ethical considerations, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines. This article reports a cross-sectional measurement of the level of implementation of such guidelines in fifteen community mental health centre units in Norway, and presents a novel fidelity scale to measure basic family involvement and support. The aim was to investigate current family involvement practices comprehensively, as a basis for targeted quality improvement.MethodsWe employed three fidelity scales, with 12–14 items, to measure family involvement practices. Items were scored from 1 to 5, where 1 equals no implementation and 5 equals full implementation. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test, and calculation of interrater reliability for the scales.ResultsThe mean score was 2.33 on the fidelity scale measuring basic family involvement and support. Among patients with psychotic disorders, only 4% had received family psychoeducation. On the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale, measuring practice and content, the mean score was 2.78. Among the eight units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 4.34. On the general organizational index scale, measuring the organisation and implementation of family psychoeducation, the mean score was 1.78. Among the units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 2.46. As a measure of interrater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.99 for the basic family involvement and support scale, 0.93 for the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale and 0.96 for the general organizational index scale.ConclusionsThe implementation level of the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders was generally poor. The quality of family psychoeducation was high, but few patients had received this evidence-based treatment. Our novel fidelity scale shows promising psychometric properties and may prove a useful tool to improve the quality of health services. There is a need to increase the implementation of family involvement practices in Norway, to reach a larger percentage of patients and relatives.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177. Registered 11.03.19.

【 授权许可】

CC BY