Development and evaluation of a parent advisory group to inform a research program for knowledge translation in child health

Research Involvement and Engagement

Lisa Hartling¹  Sarah A. Elliott¹  Shannon D. Scott²  Kelli Buckreus²  Julie Leung³ 

[1] Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, 4-472 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada;Pediatric Parent Advisory Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada;

关键词: Parents;    Advisory group;    Patient engagement;    Patient-oriented research;    Child health;    Knowledge translation;    Knowledge mobilization;    Evaluation;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40900-021-00280-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn response to a growing movement to involve patients and community stakeholders in health research, we established a parent advisory group in 2016. The group meets regularly to act as advisors and partners for our research program. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences establishing the group, and results from parent evaluations.MethodsWe contacted 191 organizations to recruit parents and caregivers of children who wanted to contribute to child health research. Our initial goal was to recruit 8 to 10 parents who would meet regularly (approximately 8 times per year). We conducted an online baseline survey of members after the first two meetings to understand motivations for participating and early experiences. Sixteen months later we conducted another online survey to identify what was going well and areas for improvement.ResultsTwelve parents initially joined the group. The baseline survey (n = 9 complete) identified motivations for participation: wanting a patient/family voice in health research; personal experience accessing health system for child’s care; wanting to improve healthcare communications. Concerns about participation included: having sufficient time to attend meetings; whether contributions would be worthwhile; and uncertainty about how the group’s input would be used in practice. Parents identified aspects that were working well: opportunity to provide constructive feedback; diversity among parents involved; well-run and organized meetings (agenda and materials sent prior to meeting, skilled facilitation, adequate time for discussion). Items parents identified as not working well were: fluctuating attendance; not knowing others in the group; challenges if attending remotely. At follow-up, there were seven active members. The follow-up survey (n = 5 complete) identified positive feedback related to group dynamics (e.g., collegial, everyone participates) and organization of meetings. Suggestions for improvement included increasing membership, regular attendance, and providing adequate information/context to allow meaningful input.ConclusionsOur experience establishing a parent advisory group and evaluation of the group by parent members have yielded tremendous insights around involving parents and patient proxies in health research. The parent advisory group is a dynamic entity requiring ongoing communication between researchers and members. Effective means of evaluating engagement is essential to ensure it is meaningful. Dedicated time, funding and resources are required for success.

【 授权许可】

CC BY