期刊论文详细信息
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach
Christopher Barakat1  Alan A. Aragon2  Guillermo Escalante3  Brad J. Schoenfeld4  Scott W. Stevenson5 
[1] Competitive Breed LLC, Tampa, FL, USA;Human Performance Laboratory, The University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA;Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University- Northridge, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Department of Kinesiology, California State University- San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA;Health Sciences Department, Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA;Integrative Bodybuilding LLC, Tampa, FL, USA;
关键词: Bodybuilding;    Competition;    Contest;    Peaking;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13102-021-00296-y
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Bodybuilding is a competitive endeavor where a combination of muscle size, symmetry, “conditioning” (low body fat levels), and stage presentation are judged. Success in bodybuilding requires that competitors achieve their peak physique during the day of competition. To this end, competitors have been reported to employ various peaking interventions during the final days leading to competition. Commonly reported peaking strategies include altering exercise and nutritional regimens, including manipulation of macronutrient, water, and electrolyte intake, as well as consumption of various dietary supplements. The primary goals for these interventions are to maximize muscle glycogen content, minimize subcutaneous water, and reduce the risk abdominal bloating to bring about a more aesthetically pleasing physique. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of evidence to support the commonly reported practices employed by bodybuilders during peak week. Hence, the purpose of this article is to critically review the current literature as to the scientific support for pre-contest peaking protocols most commonly employed by bodybuilders and provide evidence-based recommendations as safe and effective strategies on the topic.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202107222330836ZK.pdf 2072KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:10次