期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Do psychological factors affect outcomes in musculoskeletal shoulder disorders? A systematic review
Maria M. Wertli1  Eva Rasmussen-Barr2  Ali Sheikhzadeh3  Sherri Weiser3  Shira Schecter Weiner4 
[1] Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland;Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse, Zurich, Switzerland;Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Huddinge, Sweden;Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, 10014, New York, NY, USA;Graduate Program in Ergonomics and Biomechanics (ERBI), Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, USA;Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, 10014, New York, NY, USA;Graduate Program in Ergonomics and Biomechanics (ERBI), Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, USA;School of Health Sciences, Touro College, New York, NY, USA;
关键词: Conservative intervention;    Surgical intervention;    Modifiable psychological factors;    Treatment outcome;    Predictors;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-021-04359-6
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPsychological factors may impact recovery in patients undergoing treatment for shoulder complaints. The aim of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence for the effect of modifiable psychological factors (MPF) on outcome, for patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders undergoing conservative or surgical treatment. MPF refers to factors that may change with intervention.MethodsThis is a systematic literature review. Five databases searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycInfo), for longitudinal studies investigating the influence of MPF on prognosis of patients with shoulder disorders, all diagnoses, undergoing clinical interventions (conservative or surgical). Level of evidence was determined using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Moderate and high quality evidence was included. We extracted all MPF, categorized constructs into the following domains: beliefs (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery), coping (catastrophizing, avoidant coping), and affect (depression, anxiety). We evaluated constructs for its predictive value of at least one outcome. Outcomes were informed by this review. Evidence was classified into three categories: evidence for, inconclusive evidence, and evidence against.ResultsOf 1170 references, 40 distinct publications based on 35 datasets were included (intervention type: 20 surgical; 20 conservative). Overall, 22 studies (20 cohort studies and 2 RCTs) were classified as high quality and 18 studies (16 cohort studies, 2 RCTs) were classified as moderate quality. Outcomes reported included pain, disability/function, perceived recovery, physical and mental health, and work status. Based on the review, of the psychological constructs explored, these data would suggest that expectation of recovery, catastrophizing, avoidant coping, depression, and anxiety may predict outcome for patients managed surgically. In patients undergoing conservative intervention the evidence was either against (catastrophizing, depression, anxiety) or inconclusive (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery, avoidant coping) for the predictive value of psychological factors on outcome.ConclusionsFive constructs were predictive of outcome for surgically managed patients. This suggests that implementing the biopsychosocial approach (i.e., preoperative screening, intervention by a trained clinician) may be advantageous for patients recommended for shoulder surgery,,. The same is not indicated for conservatively managed patients as no conclusive association of MPF with outcomes was noted. The importance of other MPF on outcome requires further investigation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202107222323010ZK.pdf 1184KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次