Retrospective study of surgery versus non‐surgical management in limited‐disease small cell lung cancer
Jie Zhang1 
Shaolei Li1 
Xiaoling Chen1 
Jindi Han1 
Jun Nie1 
Ling Dai1 
Weiheng Hu1 
Guangming Tian1 
Xiangjuan Ma1 
Sen Han1 
Di Wu1 
Qingfeng Zheng1 
Yue Yang1 
[1] Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Thoracic Oncology II and Thoracic Surgery II, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
The role of surgery in limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is still controversial. To assess the role of surgery in SCLC we performed a retrospective analysis of survival in a group of limited stage patients, who were managed with trimodal therapy including surgery, or with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Methods
We performed a retrospective survival analysis in a series of 153 limited stage SCLC patients treated between 1995 and 2013. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to calculate the overall survival of the surgical and non-surgical groups.
Results
Median survival in all patients was 21.5 months. Median survival for surgical and non-surgical patients was 30.5 months and 16.9 months, respectively. The survival curves for the two arms are significantly different (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the benefit of surgical treatment and thoracic radiotherapy varied in a time-dependent fashion.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that surgery added to chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be associated with a therapeutic benefit in limited SCLC.