Exploring the ethical basis for conservation policy: the case of inbred wolves on Isle Royale, USA

Conservation Letters

Meredith L. Gore¹  Michael P. Nelson²  John A. Vucetich³  Amy M. Smith⁴ 

[1] Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Department of Philosophy, Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;School of Forest Resources and Environmental Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA;Tourism Research Unit, Department of Management, Monash University, Berwick, VIC 3806, Australia

关键词: Canis lupus;    conservation ethics;    content analysis;    empirical ethics;    endangered species;    genetic rescue;    stakeholder engagement;   

DOI  :  10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00191.x

来源: Wiley

【 摘 要 】

Abstract

Data about values are beneficial for resolving disagreements over conservation policy choices because values influence policy acceptance and compliance with conservation rules. Empirical conservation ethics integrate social science methods with conservation dilemmas to determine the origins of values and contribute new solutions to resolving debate. Using the case of genetically rescuing an inbred population of wolves as a policy exemplar, we explored (1) ethical paradigms invoked in justifying policy choices; (2) objects of moral relevance related to choices; and (3) ascriptions of responsibility for action. Discussion board posts revealed diverse ethical paradigms and ascriptions of responsibility, a strong tendency toward collectivism, and associations between some policy choices and ethical paradigms. Conservation ethics can help the conservation community better understand key human dimensions of conservation problems by providing a novel diagnostic framework for policy debate, structuring stakeholder engagement, and informing evaluation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.