China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform and the Future of the Giant Panda

Conservation Letters

Biao Yang⁵  Jonah Busch¹  Li Zhang²  Jianghong Ran⁵  Xiaodong Gu³  Wen Zhang⁴  Beibei Du⁵  Yu Xu⁶ 

[1] Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, USA;Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;Sichuan Wildlife Resource Survey and Conservation Management Station, Chengdu, China;Sichuan Provincial Institute of Forestry Survey and Planning, Chengdu, China;Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, China

关键词: giant panda;    collective forest tenure reform;    conservation policy;    eco‐compensation;    China;   

DOI  :  10.1111/conl.12143

来源: Wiley

【 摘 要 】

Abstract

China has recently reformed its system of collective forest tenure to allow commercial logging, increased collection of firewood and nontimber forest products by outside enterprises, unmanaged tourism, and certain types of industrial development to occur in collective forests where these activities were previously restrained. The reform would also allow private or public agencies to buy back certain development rights from communities for conservation purposes (“eco-compensation”). We examine the impacts that the tenure reform could have on the survival of the giant panda, with or without eco-compensation in place. We estimate that $1,229 million in effective eco-compensation payments could prevent an estimated 15% decline in the giant panda population, whereas an additional $3,707 million for effective eco-compensation and restoration of potential habitat could restore the giant panda population to an estimated 40% above current levels. Specifically, we identify 14 key areas that link fragmented panda populations and habitats, and where approximately $779 million is needed for eco-compensation, matched with an additional investment of $131 million for the restoration of native forest habitat.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright and Photocopying: © 2014 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.