Pretending to Be Better Than They Are? Emotional Manipulation in Imprisoned Fraudsters

Frontiers in Psychology

Shuliang Bai¹  Edward M. Bernat²  Anthony A. Vivino²  Qianglong Wang³  Zhenbiao Liu⁴  Bo Yang⁵  Zhuo Zhang⁵  Chao Liu⁶  Zilu Liang⁶ 

[1] Department of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China;Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States;School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China;School of Foreign Language, Taishan University, Tai’an, China;School of Sociology, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China;State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;

关键词: imprisoned fraudsters;    emotional manipulation;    psychopathy;    MEOS;    emotion recognition;    empathy;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562269

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Fraud can cause severe financial losses and affect the physical and mental health of victims. This study aimed to explore the manipulative characteristics of fraudsters and their relationship with other psychological variables. Thirty-four fraudsters were selected from a medium-security prison in China, and thirty-one healthy participants were recruited online. Both groups completed an emotional face-recognition task and self-report measures assaying emotional manipulation, psychopathy, emotion recognition, and empathy. Results showed that imprisoned fraudsters had higher accuracy in identifying fear and surprise faces but lower accuracy in identifying happiness than controls (t = 5.26, p < 0.001; t = 2.38, p < 0.05; t = 3.75, p < 0.001). Significantly lower scores on non-prosocial factors on the Managing the Emotions of Others scale (MEOS) were found for imprisoned fraudsters, relative to controls (t = 3.21, p < 0.01). Imprisoned fraudsters had low scores in the assessment of psychopathy than the control group, especially Factor 1 (t = 2.04, p = 0.05). For empathy, imprisoned fraudsters had significantly higher scores in perspective-taking than controls (t = 2.03, p = 0.05). Correlation analyses revealed that psychopathic traits were positively correlated with non-prosocial factors in both groups. However, the relationships between emotional manipulation and emotional recognition and empathy were not consistent across the groups. The results suggest that fraudsters may pretend to be as prosocial as healthy controls, who had lower antisocial tendencies, normal empathy ability, and would like to manipulate others’ emotions positively during social interaction.

【 授权许可】

CC BY