Understanding Older Adults' Memory Distortion in the Light of Stereotype Threat

Frontiers in Psychology

Amy M. Smith¹  McKinzey Torrance²  Ayanna K. Thomas²  Marie Mazerolle³ 

[1] Department of Psychology, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, United States;Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States;Laboratoire de Recherches Intégratives en Neurosciences et Psychologie Cognitive & MSHE Ledoux, CNRS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France;

关键词: aging;    stereotype threat;    memory distortion;    regulatory focus;    executive resources depletion;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628696

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Numerous studies have documented the detrimental impact of age-based stereotype threat (ABST) on older adults' cognitive performance and especially on veridical memory. However, far fewer studies have investigated the impact of ABST on older adults' memory distortion. Here, we review the subset of research examining memory distortion and provide evidence for the role of stereotype threat as a powerful socio-emotional factor that impacts age-related susceptibility to memory distortion. In this review we define memory distortion as errors in memory that are associated with gist-based errors or source misattributions. Whereas, some of the reviewed experiments support the conclusion that ABST should be considered in the context of age-related differences in memory distortion, others reported little or no impact of stereotype threat. These discrepancies suggest that the role of ABST, and socio-emotional processes generally, in age-related changes in memory distortion are less clear. In this review, we argue that ABST does play an important role in age-related changes in memory distortion. We present evidence suggesting that discrepancies in the reviewed literature may be reconciled when evaluated in the context of the leading theories about stereotype threat: the Executive Resource Depletion hypothesis and the Regulatory Focus theory. We also discuss how differences in methodology and participant characteristics can account for a priori contradictory results in the literature. Finally, we propose some recommendations for researchers and practitioners when assessing memory in older adults.

【 授权许可】

CC BY