A qualitative study on continuous deep sedation until death as an alternative to assisted suicide in Switzerland

BMC Palliative Care

Martyna Tomczyk¹  Ralf J. Jox²  Nathalie Dieudonné-Rahm³ 

[1] Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital & University of Lausanne, Av. de Provence 82, CH-1007, Lausanne, Switzerland;Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital & University of Lausanne, Av. de Provence 82, CH-1007, Lausanne, Switzerland;Palliative & Supportive Care Service, Chair in Geriatric Palliative Care, Lausanne University Hospital & University of Lausanne, Av. Pierre-Decker 5, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland;Palliative Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Chemin de la Savonnière 11, 1245 Collonge Bellerive, Geneva, Switzerland;

关键词: Continuous deep sedation until death;    Palliative sedation;    Temporary sedation;    Assisted suicide;    Palliative care;    Qualitative study;    Physicians;    French-speaking part of Switzerland;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12904-021-00761-y

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAccording to the European Association for Palliative Care, decisions regarding palliative sedation should not be made in response to requests for assisted dying, such as euthanasia or assisted suicide. However, several studies show that continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD) – a particular form of sedation – has been considered as an alternative to these practices in some countries. In Switzerland, where assisted suicide is decriminalized and CDSUD is not legally regulated, no studies have comprehensively investigated their relation. Our study aimed to identify and describe the experience among palliative care physicians of CDSUD as a potential alternative to assisted suicide in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.MethodsWe performed an exploratory multicentre qualitative study based on interviews with palliative care physicians in the French-speaking part of Switzerland and conducted linguistic and thematic analysis of all interview transcripts. The study is described in accordance with COREQ guidelines.ResultsWe included 10 interviews conducted in four palliative care units. Our linguistic analysis shows four main types of sedation, which we called ‘rapid CDSUD’, ‘gradual CDSUD’, ‘temporary sedation’ and ‘intermittent sedation’. CDSUD (rapid or gradual) was not considered an alternative to assisted suicide, even if a single situation has been reported. In contrast, ‘temporary’ or ‘intermittent sedation’, although not medically indicated, was sometimes introduced in response to a request for assisted suicide. This was the fact when there were barriers to an assisted suicide at home (e.g., when transfer home was impossible or the patient wished not to burden the family).ConclusionThese preliminary results can guide clinical, ethical, linguistic and legal reflection in this field and be used to explore this question more deeply at the national and international levels in a comparative, interdisciplinary and multiprofessional approach. They can also be useful to update Swiss clinical guidelines on palliative sedation in order to include specific frameworks on various sedation protocols and sedation as an alternative to assisted suicide. Potential negative impacts of considering palliative sedation as an alternative to assisted suicide should be nuanced by open and honest societal debate.

【 授权许可】

CC BY