Learning from public health and hospital resilience to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: protocol for a multiple case study (Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali)

Health Research Policy and Systems

Jean-Christophe Lucet¹  Nathan Peiffer-Smadja²  Shinichiro Noda³  Toyomitsu Tamura³  Hiroko Baba³  Haruka Kodoi⁴  Valéry Ridde⁵  Lola Traverson⁵  Fanny Chabrol⁵  Renyou Hou⁶  Pierre-Marie David⁷  Christian Dagenais⁸  Gisele Cazarin⁹  Sydia Rosana de Araujo Oliveira⁹  Abdourahmane Coulibaly^1,10  Laurence Touré^1,10  Arnaud Duhoux^1,11  Ayako Honda^1,12  Lara Gautier^1,13  Kate Zinszer^1,13  Patrick Cloos^1,14  Emmanuel Bonnet^1,15 

[1] AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France;IAME, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France;AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France;IAME, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France;National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK;Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France;Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France;Laboratory of Ethnology and Comparative Sociology, Université Paris Nanterre/CNRS, Paris, France;Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada;Pole 1 de recherche sur la transformation des pratiques cliniques et organisationnelles, CISSS de Laval, Montréal, Canada;Faculté des arts et des sciences, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Institut Aggeu Magalhães, Oswaldo Cruz Fondacion, Recife, Brazil;MISELI, Bamako, Mali;Pole 1 de recherche sur la transformation des pratiques cliniques et organisationnelles, CISSS de Laval, Montréal, Canada;Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Research Center for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan;School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Centre de recherche en santé publique (CRePS), Université de Montréal et CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada;School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Centre de recherche en santé publique (CRePS), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;UMR 215 Prodig, CNRS, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, AgroParisTech, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), Aubervilliers, France;

关键词: Hospital;    COVID-19;    Resilience;    Equity;    Public health;    Design;    Lessons learned;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-021-00707-z

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAll prevention efforts currently being implemented for COVID-19 are aimed at reducing the burden on strained health systems and human resources. There has been little research conducted to understand how SARS-CoV-2 has affected health care systems and professionals in terms of their work. Finding effective ways to share the knowledge and insight between countries, including lessons learned, is paramount to the international containment and management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to compare the pandemic response to COVID-19 in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali. This comparison will be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the response, including challenges for health professionals and health systems.MethodsWe will use a multiple case study approach with multiple levels of nested analysis. We have chosen these countries as they represent different continents and different stages of the pandemic. We will focus on several major hospitals and two public health interventions (contact tracing and testing). It will employ a multidisciplinary research approach that will use qualitative data through observations, document analysis, and interviews, as well as quantitative data based on disease surveillance data and other publicly available data. Given that the methodological approaches of the project will be largely qualitative, the ethical risks are minimal. For the quantitative component, the data being used will be made publicly available.DiscussionWe will deliver lessons learned based on a rigorous process and on strong evidence to enable operational-level insight for national and international stakeholders.

【 授权许可】

CC BY