Safety and efficacy of a novel cephalomedullary nail in femoral shaft fractures: a retrospective observational cohort in 33 patients

Patient Safety in Surgery

Khang H. Dang¹  Jorge C. De Leon¹  Ravi A. Karia¹  Connor S. Breinholt²  Cooper B. Tye² 

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, MC-7774, 78229, San Antonio, TX, USA;Long School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA;

关键词: META-TAN;    Intramedullary nail failure;    Femur shaft nonunion;    Femur shaft implant failure;    Femur fracture;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13037-020-00269-z

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundDespite advances in femoral shaft fracture fixation, the nonunion rate remains relatively high; and there is limited data on the efficacy and failure rate of specific implants. A novel cephalomedullary nail provides the ability to treat femur shaft fractures in isolation, with associated ipsilateral femur injuries, and provides various options for proximal and distal fixation exists on the market; but literature remains limited on the safety and efficacy of this implant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the early failure rate of this cephalomedullary nail, while comparing the nonunion rate to what is currently presented in the literature. This study is the first of its kind in evaluation of a specific implant for treatment of femoral shaft fractures and ipsilateral pathology.MethodsPatients over 18 years of age, with traumatic femur shaft fractures, treated with this particular cephalomedullary nail and available for a minimum of 3-month follow-up were included for analysis. Data was collected by retrospective chart review and review of existing radiographs. Demographic data, injury details, AO/OTA fracture classification, and implant details were recorded for each patient. Primary outcome measured was implant failures (screw or nail breakage). Secondary outcomes measured included malunion, nonunion, deep infection, post-operative complications, and need for reoperation.ResultsOf the 33 patients included for analysis, 1 patient went on to non-union. There were no cases of implant failure. The single nonunion was a high-energy mechanism, open fracture, and higher level AO/OTA classification. The remaining 32 reached radiographic union at 3 months.ConclusionThe nonunion rate of this novel cephalomedullary nail is comparable to what is reported in the literature. This nail is a safe and effective implant to treat femoral shaft fractures with a variety of ipsilateral femoral shaft injuries and reliably leads fracture union. Further studies are needed analyzing implant failure and comparing specific implants.

【 授权许可】

CC BY