Is T2 mapping reliable in evaluation of native and repair cartilage tissue of the knee?

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Hang Thi Tran¹  Hasan Banitalebi²  Per-Henrik Randsborg³  Christian Owesen³  Tor Åge Myklebust⁴  Asbjørn Årøen⁵ 

[1] Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway;Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway;Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre, Oslo, Norway;Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway;Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre, Oslo, Norway;

关键词: T2 mapping;    MRI;    Articular cartilage;    Reliability;    Cartilage repair;    Autologous chondrocyte implantation;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40634-021-00350-1

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of imaging plane and experience of observers on the reliability of T2 mapping of native and repair cartilage tissue of the knee.MethodsFifteen consecutive patients from two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this cross-sectional study. Patients with an isolated knee cartilage lesion were randomised to receive either debridement or microfracture (RCT 1) or debridement or autologous chondrocyte implantation (RCT 2). T2 mapping was performed in coronal and sagittal planes two years postoperatively. A musculoskeletal radiologist, a resident of radiology and two orthopaedic surgeons measured the T2 values independently. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with 95% Confidence Intervals was used to calculate the inter- and intraobserver agreement.ResultsMean age for the patients was 36.8 ± 11 years, 8 (53%) were men. The overall interobserver agreement varied from poor to good with ICCs in the range of 0.27– 0.76 for native cartilage and 0.00 – 0.90 for repair tissue. The lowest agreement was achieved for evaluations of repair cartilage tissue. The estimated ICCs suggested higher inter- and intraobserver agreement for radiologists. On medial femoral condyles, T2 values were higher for native cartilage on coronal images (p < 0.001) and for repair tissue on sagittal images (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe reliability of T2 mapping of articular cartilage is influenced by the imaging plane and the experience of the observers. This influence may be more profound for repair cartilage tissue. This is important to consider when using T2 mapping to measure outcomes after cartilage repair surgery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02637505 and NCT02636881, registered December 2015.Level of evidenceII, based on prospective data from two RCTs.

【 授权许可】

CC BY