| BMC Health Services Research | |
| Implementation, spread and impact of the Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) across Ontario hospitals: a mixed methods evaluation | |
| George Tomlinson1  John Matelski2  Audrey Chaput3  Betty Oldershaw4  Chaim Bell5  Murray Krahn6  Ann Turcotte7  Sheila Hogan8  Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg9  Tai Huynh9  Howard Abrams9  Craig Madho9  Christine Ferguson1,10  Connie Free1,11  Bonnie Nicholas1,12  Karen Okrainec1,13  Valeria Rac1,13  | |
| [1] Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;Biostatistics Research Unity, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;Caregiver Advisor, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;Chatham Kent Health Alliance, Chatham, Canada;Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada;Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada;Markham Stouffville Hospital, Markham, Canada;OpenLab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;Renfrew Victoria Hospital, Renfrew, Canada;St. Josephs General Hospital Elliot Lake, Elliot Lake, Canada;Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Canada;Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; | |
| 关键词: Implementation; Discharge; Patient Centred; Transitions in care; Local adaptability; Triangulation; Patient experience; Quality improvement; Hospital; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12913-021-06374-8 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundTraditional discharge processes lack a patient-centred focus. This project studied the implementation and effectiveness of an individualized discharge tool across Ontario hospitals. The Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) is an individualized discharge tool with guidelines that was co-designed with patients and families to enable a patient-centred process.MethodsTwenty one acute-care and rehabilitation hospitals in Ontario, Canada engaged in a community of practice and worked over a period of 18 months to implement PODS. An effectiveness-implementation hybrid design using a triangulation approach was used with hospital-collected data, patient and provider surveys, and interviews of project teams. Key outcomes included: penetration and fidelity of the intervention, change in patient-centred processes, patient and provider satisfaction and experience, and healthcare utilization. Statistical methods included linear mixed effects models and generalized estimating equations.ResultsOf 65,221 discharges across hospitals, 41,884 patients (64%) received a PODS. There was variation in reach and implementation pattern between sites, though none of the between site covariates was significantly associated with implementation success. Both high participation in the community of practice and high fidelity were associated with higher penetration. PODS improved family involvement during discharge teaching (7% increase, p = 0.026), use of teach-back (11% increase, p < 0.001) and discussion of help needed (6% increase, p = 0.041). Although unscheduled healthcare utilization decreased with PODS implementation, it was not statistically significant.ConclusionsThis project highlighted the system-wide adaptability and ease of implementing PODS across multiple patient groups and hospital settings. PODS demonstrated an improvement in patient-centred discharge processes linked to quality standards and health outcomes. A community of practice and high quality content may be needed for successful implementation.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202107036915945ZK.pdf | 938KB |
PDF