High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients

Cancer Cell International

Yan Meng¹  Junwei Wang¹  Zhenzhen Liu¹  Siyi Lu¹  Wei Fu¹  Xin Zhou¹  Fei Li¹  Bingyan Wang¹  Hao Wang²  Yuxia Wang² 

[1] Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191, Beijing, China;Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191, Beijing, China;

关键词: Rectal cancer;    CFP;    Prognosis;    Tumor regression grade;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12935-021-01903-1

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPreoperative tumor markers, inflammation, and nutritional status are considered important predictors of prognosis and tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio Index (FARI), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in LARC patients and compared them with a novel combined CEA-FARI-PNI (CFP) scoring system.MethodsA total of 138 LARC patients undergoing radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) between January 2012 and March 2019 were enrolled. The X-tile program was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of CEA, FARI, and PNI, and CFP scoring system was constructed accordingly. The prognostic ability of these factors was assessed by the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan–Meier, Cox regression, and logistic regression. Nomogram was established to evaluate the predictive role of these factors in tumor response.ResultsThe optimal cut-off values of CEA, FARI, and PNI were 5.15 ng/l, 10.56%, and 42.25 g/L, respectively. The time-dependent ROC curve showed that compared to CEA, FARI, and PNI, CFP showed stable predictive efficacy for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In multivariate analysis, CFP was the only factor that could independently predict OS (HR = 8.117, p = 0.001) and DFS (HR = 4.994, p < 0.001). Moreover, high CFP (OR = 3.693, p = 0.002) was also an independent risk factor of poor response. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomograms for predicting tumor response was better including CFP (0.717) than without CFP (0.656) (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe CFP score was a more reliable marker for predicting OS, DFS, and NCRT efficacy in LARC patients, and the score could apparently improve predicted efficacy of the nomogram.

【 授权许可】

CC BY