Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program

BMC Pediatrics

Roberta Pineda¹  Joan Smith²  Graham Colditz³  Jenny Kwon⁴  Jessica Roussin⁵  Elizabeth Heiny⁶ 

[1] Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Department of Quality, Safety, and Practice Excellence, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA;Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA;Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA;Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA;Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA;Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA;Department of Therapy Services, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA;

关键词: Parent;    Environment;    Therapy;    Outcomes;    Fidelity;    Preterm;    Reach;    Effectiveness;    Adoptability;    Maintenance;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-021-02594-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTo maximize the benefit of parent-directed, positive sensory exposures in the NICU, a structured sensory-based program titled the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program was developed that includes specific doses and targeted timing of evidence-based sensory exposures.MethodsThe Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to systematically evaluate the SENSE program as an implementation strategy. One-hundred preterm infants ≤32 weeks gestation were studied (61 receiving the SENSE program and 39 standard-of-care). Parent education time and infant sensory exposures were tracked, and parents completed a questionnaire that probed their perceptions about the SENSE program.ResultsOne-hundered thirty-one families were recruited, and 100 (76%) enrolled. The SENSE program was initiated at an average postmenstrual age of 29.8 (±2.4) weeks; 4.9 (±5.6) days after birth. The average number of education sessions with families was 4.8 (±3.7) amounting to 72.3 (±37.4) total minutes over hospitalization. The total time of logged tactile and auditory exposures among SENSE recipients over the length of hospitalization was a median (IQ range) of 9325 (5295-15,694) minutes over an average of 10.1 (±7.6) weeks of hospitalization. There were differences in the proportion of tactile and auditory exposure targets received by the infant among those receiving the SENSE program compared to standard-of-care (91% compared to 48%; p < 0.0001). Ninety-five percent of infants tolerated the SENSE program as defined, with 5% of infants requiring intermittent adaptations or the interventions being stopped for a period that typically lasted 1–2 weeks. Earlier parent education was related to more parent participation in SENSE program interventions (p = 0.04). Eighty-five percent of participants receiving the SENSE program had most of the sensory interventions completed by parents, as opposed to the medical or sensory support team. Seventy-two percent of infants had at least 100% of the auditory and tactile doses conducted over the length of stay. Parents reported acceptability.ConclusionThe SENSE program had good reach, was effective and acceptable with minimal cost, was adopted, and had good fidelity. Insights from implementation of the SENSE program (within a research study) informed future strategies to aid maintenance during dissemination.

【 授权许可】

CC BY