Sex differences in the association between latent class of lifestyle and disability among older adults in China

BMC Geriatrics

Jian Xiao¹  Jianlin Lin¹  Ya Fang²  Zaixing Shi² 

[1] Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Fujian Province, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Fujian Province, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;

关键词: Aging;    Disability;    Lifestyle;    Sex differences;    Latent class analysis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12877-021-02087-z

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA healthy lifestyle may prevent disability for older adults. But research to date is limited to a single lifestyle behavior and ignore sex difference in the lifestyle-disability association. This study aimed at identifying sex-specific latent classes of lifestyle and their relationship with disability among older Chinese adults.MethodsData were obtained from adults aged 65 years or above in the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, a nationally representative sample of older adults in China. We used latent class analysis to categorize participants into subgroups based on three dimensions of lifestyle factors: health behaviors, psychological wellbeing, and social engagement. Disability was assessed by the activities of daily living (ADL). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between the latent lifestyle classes and disability.ResultsA total of 15,771 older adults were included in this analysis, of whom 56% were women and 66% aged 80 years or above. We identified four latent lifestyle classes among older women: “Health Promoting” (28%), “Isolated and Health Harming” (34%), “Restless and Dismal” (21%), and “Restless” (17%). A different set of four lifestyle classes were identified in older men: “Health Promoting” (21%), “Isolated and Health Harming” (26%), “Restless and Dismal” (20%), and “Discordant” (33%). Compared with the “Health Promoting” class, the “Isolated and Health Harming” class (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.46–2.43) and the “Restless and Dismal” class (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.27–2.20) had higher risk of disability in women. The “Discordant” class had lower risk of disability in men (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37–0.72).ConclusionsOur analyses revealed different lifestyle patterns for older women and men in China. Sex differences in the associations between lifestyle and disability need to be considered when formulating interventions to prevent disability.

【 授权许可】

CC BY