Insights into Imaging | |
Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols | |
Davide Bellini1  Iacopo Carbone1  Nicola Panvini1  Marco Rengo1  Paolo Anibaldi2  Benedetta Bracci3  Damiano Caruso3  Michela Polici3  Andrea Laghi3  Elisa Rosati3  Elsa Iannicelli3  Giulia Moltoni3  Domenico De Santis3  Marta Zerunian3  Elena Lucertini3  | |
[1] Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy;Hospital Direction and Clinical Departments, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy;Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy; | |
关键词: Computed tomography; Contrast media; Lean body weight; Oncologic imaging; Abdomen; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0 | |
来源: Springer | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundPatient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement.ResultsOne-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020).ConclusionsLBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202107027769284ZK.pdf | 1136KB | download |