Anthropometry at discharge and risk of relapse in children treated for severe acute malnutrition: a prospective cohort study in rural Nepal

Nutrition Journal

Benjamin Guesdon¹  Sujay Nepali²  Manisha Katwal²  Amod Kumar Poudyal³  Tusli Ram Bhandari⁴  Emilie Counil⁵ 

[1] Action Against Hunger

[2]  Action Contre la Faim (ACF) - France, 14-16 Boulevard Douaumont, 75854, Paris, France;Action Against Hunger

[3]  Action Contre la Faim (ACF)- Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal;Central Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine (IOM), Tribhuvan University (TU), Kirtipur, Nepal;Department of Public Health, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University (PoU), Pokhara, Nepal;Institut national d’études démographiques (INED), F-93322, Aubervilliers, France;

关键词: Severe acute malnutrition;    Discharge;    Relapse;    WHZ;    MUAC;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12937-021-00684-7

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThere is a dearth of evidence on what should be the optimal criteria for discharging children from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) treatment. Programs discharging children while they are still presenting varying levels of weight-for-height (WHZ) or mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) deficits, such as those implemented under the current national protocol in Nepal, are opportunities to fill this evidence gap.MethodsWe followed a cohort of children discharged as cured from SAM treatment in Parasi district, Nepal. Relapse as SAM, defined as the occurrence of WHZ<-3 or MUAC < 115 mm or nutritional edema, was investigated through repeated home visits, during six months after discharge. We assessed the contribution of remaining anthropometric deficits at discharge to relapse risk through Cox regressions.ResultsRelapse as SAM during follow-up was observed in 33 % of the cohort (35/108). Being discharged before reaching the internationally recommended criteria was overall associated with a large increase in the risk of relapse (HR = 3.3; p = 0.006). Among all anthropometric indicators at discharge, WHZ<-2 led to a three-fold increase in relapse risk (HR = 3.2; p = 0.003), while MUAC < 125 mm significantly raised it only in the older children. WHZ<-2 at discharge came up as the only significant predictor of relapse in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.8, p = 0.01), even among children with a MUAC ≥ 125 mm. Of note, more than 80 % of the events of relapse as SAM would have been missed if WHZ had not been monitored and used in the definition of relapse.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the priority for SAM management programs should be to ensure that children reach a high level of WHZ at discharge, at least above or equal to the WHO recommended cut-off. The validity of using a single MUAC cut-off such as 125 mm as a suitable discharge criterion for all age groups is questioned. Further follow-up studies providing a complete assessment of nutritional status at discharge and not based on a restricted MUAC-only definition of relapse as SAM would be urgently needed to set evidence-based discharge criteria. These studies are also required to assess programs currently discounting or omitting WHZ for identification and management of SAM.

【 授权许可】

CC BY