Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for pain, Constant-Murley score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with subacromial pain syndrome

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Pasi Aronen¹  Teemu V. Karjalainen²  Jarkko Jokihaara³  Kari Kanto⁴  Simo Taimela⁵  Tuomas Lähdeoja⁵  Mika Paavola⁵  Teppo L. N. Järvinen⁵  Clare L. Ardern⁶ 

[1] Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine at University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Tukholmankatu 8B, 00290, Helsinki, Finland;Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland;Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520, Tampere, Finland;Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, TAYS Hatanpää, Hatanpäänkatu 24, 33900, Tampere, Finland;Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, HUS, 00029, Helsinki, Finland;Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institute, H1 Fysioterapi, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden;

关键词: Clinimetrics, minimal important change, MID, MCID, patient accepted symptom state, PASS, responsiveness;    Outcome measures;    Visual analogue scale (VAS);    Simple shoulder test;    Constant-Murley score;    Pain;    Subacromial pain;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12874-021-01241-w

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe results of clinical trials should be assessed for both statistical significance and importance of observed effects to patients. Minimal important difference (MID) is a threshold denoting a difference that is important to patients. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a threshold above which patients feel well.ObjectiveTo determine MID and PASS for common outcome instruments in patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS).MethodsWe used data from the FIMPACT trial, a randomised controlled trial of treatment for SAPS that included 193 patients. The outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity, both measured with the 0–100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), the Constant-Murley score (CS), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). The transition question was a five-point global rating of change. We used three anchor-based methods to determine the MID for improvement: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the mean difference of change and the mean change methods. For the PASS, we used the ROC and 75th percentile methods and calculated estimates using two different anchor question thresholds.ResultsDifferent MID methods yielded different estimates. The ROC method yielded the smallest estimates for MID: 20 mm for shoulder pain on arm activity, 10 points for CS and 1.5 points for SST, with good to excellent discrimination (areas under curve (AUCs) from 0.86 to 0.94). We could not establish a reliable MID for pain at rest. The PASS estimates were consistent between methods. The ROC method PASS thresholds using a conservative anchor question threshold were 2 mm for pain at rest, 9 mm for pain on activity, 80 points for CS and 11 points for SST, with AUCs from 0.74 to 0.83.ConclusionWe recommend the smallest estimate from different methods as the MID, because it is very unlikely that changes smaller than the smallest MID estimate are important to patients: 20 mm for pain VAS on arm activity, 10 points for CS and 1.5 points for SST. We recommend PASS estimates of 9 mm for pain on arm activity, 80 points for CS, and 11 points for SST.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00428870 (first registered January 29, 2007).

【 授权许可】

CC BY