Measuring the intensity of conflicts in conservation

Conservation Letters

John Wilson¹  Nils Bunnefeld¹  Jeremy J. Cusack²  Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence³  Sahil Nijhawan⁴  Dario Gerardo Zambrano Cortes⁵  Lara Moreno Zárate⁶  Vincent Naude⁷  Sofia Castelló y Tickell⁸  Håvard Hegre⁹  Zachary Baynham‐Herd^1,10  Isla Duporge^1,11 

[1] Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK;Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK;Centro de Modelación y Monitoreo de Ecosistemas, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile;Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK;RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, 2 Lochside View, Edinburgh, EH12 9DH;Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK;Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands;Grupo de Gestión de Recursos Cinegéticos y Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Ciudad Real, Spain;Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa;Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;

关键词: armed conflict;    coexistence;    curve;    deescalation;    discourse;    escalation;    spatiotemporal;    stakeholder groups;    stasis;    trend;   

DOI  :  10.1111/conl.12783

来源: Wiley

【 授权许可】

CC BY