Measuring the intensity of conflicts in conservation

Conservation Letters

John Wilson¹  Nils Bunnefeld¹  Jeremy J. Cusack²  Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence³  Sahil Nijhawan⁴  Dario Gerardo Zambrano Cortes⁵  Lara Moreno Zárate⁶  Vincent Naude⁷  Sofia Castelló y Tickell⁸  Håvard Hegre⁹  Zachary Baynham‐Herd^1,10  Isla Duporge^1,11 

[1]Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

[2]Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

[3]Centro de Modelación y Monitoreo de Ecosistemas, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile

[4]Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

[5]RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, 2 Lochside View, Edinburgh, EH12 9DH

[6]Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK

[7]Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

[8]Grupo de Gestión de Recursos Cinegéticos y Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Ciudad Real, Spain

[9]Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

[10]Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

[11]Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

[12]School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

[13]Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

关键词: armed conflict;    coexistence;    curve;    deescalation;    discourse;    escalation;    spatiotemporal;    stakeholder groups;    stasis;    trend;   

DOI  :  10.1111/conl.12783

来源: Wiley

【 授权许可】

CC BY