Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

European spine journal

article

Takashi Fujishiro¹  Louis Boissière²  Derek Thomas Cawley²  Daniel Larrieu²  Olivier Gille²  Jean-Marc Vital²  Ferran Pellisé³  Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso⁴  Frank Kleinstück⁵  Emre Acaroglu⁶  Ahmet Alanay⁷  Ibrahim Obeid² 

[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College;L’Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital;Spine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Val Hebron;Spine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz;Spine Center;Ankara Spine Center;Spine Surgery Unit, Acibadem Maslak Hospital

关键词: Adult spinal deformity;    Decision-making process;    Surgical indication;    Surgical management;    Adult scoliosis;    Scoring system;   

DOI  :  10.1007/s00586-019-06068-0

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

We aimed to develop and internally validate a scoring system, the adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making (ASD-SDM) score, to guide the decision-making process for ASD patients aged above 40 years. A multicentre prospective ASD database was retrospectively reviewed. The scoring system was developed using data from a derivation set and was internally validated in a validation set. The performance of the ASD-SDM score for predicting surgical management was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A total of 702 patients were included for analysis in the present study. The scoring system developed based on 562 patients, ranging from 0 to 12 points, included five parameters: leg pain scored by the numerical rating scale; pain and self-image domains in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 score; coronal Cobb angle; and relative spinopelvic alignment. Surgical indication was graded as low (score 0 to 4), moderate (score 5 to 7), and high (score 8 to 12) groups. In the validation set of 140 patients, the AUC for predicting surgical management according to the ASD-SDM score was 0.797 (standard error = 0.037, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.714 to 0.861), and in the low, moderate, and high surgical indication groups, 23.7%, 43.5%, and 80.4% of the patients, respectively, were treated surgically. The ASD-SDM score demonstrated reliability, with higher scores indicating a higher probability of surgery. This index could aid in the selection of surgery for ASD patients in clinical settings. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

【 授权许可】

Unknown