期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Urological Surgery
Effect of the Anesthetic Method on the Outcomes of Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Multi-center Study of the Society of Urological Surgery Aegean Study Group
article
Fuat Kızılay1  Bora İrer2  Volkan Şen2  Oğuzcan Erbatu3  Şakir Ongün4  Alperen Yıldız5  Önder Çınar6  Mehmet Şahin1  Mehmet Oğuz Şahin7  Ahmet Cihan8  Oktay Üçer3  Ozan Bozkurt5 
[1] Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology;İzmir Metropolitan Municipality Eşrefpaşa Hospital, Clinic of Urology;Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology;İstanbul Bahçelievler State Hospital, Clinic of Urology;Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology;Bülent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology;Manisa State Hospital, Clinic of Urology;Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology
关键词: Ureteroscopy;    Ureteral stone;    Spinal anesthesia;    General anesthesia;    Complication;   
DOI  :  10.4274/jus.2123
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Galenos Yayinevi
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objective: To analyze the effect of the anesthesia method (spinal and general) on the outcome of ureteroscopy (URS) in patients treated for proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: Patients, who underwent URS for proximal ureteral stones at various urology clinics in Turkiye, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method performed; the procedure was performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) in group 1 and general anesthesia (GA) in group 2. Patients’ demographic, perioperative data and complication rates were compared between the two groups in a retrospective manner. Results: There were 309 and 329 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean stone area and Hounsfield unit in GA group were higher (p0.05). The rate of success of URS, which is accepted as complete stone-free status, was higher in the SA group (p=0.041). Conclusion: URS, which is used in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones, has a high success rate, independent of the anesthesia method used. It is important to keep in mind the patient’s comorbidities prior to selecting the anesthesia method and that the stone area and the Hounsfield unit are the important factors affecting the outcomes.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC-ND   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202106300002576ZK.pdf 119KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:1次