Diagnostic Utility of New SCAT5 Neurological Screen Sub-tests

Sports Medicine - Open

Gordon Ward Fuller¹  Ross Tucker²  Prabhat Mathema³  John Miles³  Martin Raftery⁴  Marc Douglas⁴  Eanna Falvey⁴ 

[1] Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, S1 4DA, Sheffield, UK;University of Cape Town School of Management Studies, Cape Town, South Africa;Wales Rugby Union, Principality Stadium, Westgate Street, CF10 1NS, Cardiff, UK;World Rugby, World Rugby House 8-10 Lower Pembroke Street, Dublin 2, Ireland;

关键词: Brain Concussion;    Screening;    Rugby;    Diagnostic accuracy;    SCAT5;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40798-021-00303-z

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) is recommended to screen for concussion following head impact events in elite sport. The most recent 5th edition (SCAT5) included a ‘rapid neurological screen’ which introduced new subtests examining comprehension, passive neck movement, and diplopia. This study evaluated the additional diagnostic value of these new subtests.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed in the Pro14 elite Rugby Union competition between September 2018 and January 2020. The SCAT5 was administered by the team doctor to players undergoing off-field screening for concussion during a medical room assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, false negatives, and positives were examined for SCAT5 comprehension, passive neck movement, and diplopia subtests. The reference standard was a final diagnosis of concussion, established by serial standardised clinical assessments over 48 h.ResultsNinety-three players undergoing off-field screening for concussion were included. Sensitivity and specificity of the comprehension, passive neck movement, and diplopia subtests were 0, 8, 5% and 0, 91, 97%, respectively (concussion prevalence 63%). No players had any abnormality in comprehension. No players had abnormal passive neck movement or diplopia in the absence of abnormalities in other SCAT5 sub-components.ConclusionsThe new SCAT5 neurological screen subtests are normal in the majority of players undergoing off-field concussion screening and appear to lack diagnostic utility over and above other SCAT5 subtests.

【 授权许可】

CC BY