Specific considerations for research on the effectiveness of multisectoral collaboration: methods and lessons from 12 country case studies

Globalization and Health

Silvia Xinico¹  Diana Vaca McGhie²  Victoria Saint³  Jetske van Dijk⁴  Klaus Baesel⁵  Jai K. Das⁶  Lucy Singh⁷  Sarah Simpson⁸  Saidatul Norbaya Bt Buang⁹  Louise Bury^1,10  Daria Ukhova^1,11  John Murray^1,12  Corinne Armstrong^1,13  Jennifer Franz-Vasdeki^1,14  Wendy Graham^1,15  Ilona Renner^1,16  Eriana Asri^1,17  Marion Roche^1,18  Helga Fogstad^1,19  Rachael Hinton^2,20  Sarah Barnett^2,21  Susana Palma^2,22  Helia Molina Milman^2,23  Carla Blauvelt^2,24  Shyama Kuruvilla^2,25 

[1] Alianza Nacional de Organizaciones de Mujeres Indigenas por la Salud Reproductiva Nutrición y Educación (ALIANMISAR), Guatemala City, Guatemala;American Heart Association, Washington, DC, USA;Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany;Cherie Blair Foundation, (Formerly Child to Child), London, UK;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Bonn, Germany;Division of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan;EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK;EquiACT, Lyon, France;Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;Global Research Consultancy, Ipswich, UK;Independent consultant, Glasgow, UK;Independent consultant, Iowa City, Iowa, USA;Independent consultant, London, UK;Independent consultant, Seattle, USA;London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;National Centre for Early Prevention, Federal Centre for Health Education, Koeln, Germany;Nutrition International, Jakarta, Indonesia;Nutrition International, Ottawa, Canada;Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland;Rachael Hinton Editing, Geneva, Switzerland;SB Consultancy World, Bristol, UK;USAID Health Education and Policy Project, Guatemala City, Guatemala;University of Santiago, Santiago, Chile;VillageReach, Lilongwe, Malawi;World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland;

关键词: Multisectoral collaboration;    Sustainable development goals;    Research;    women’s health;    Adolescent health;    children’s health;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12992-021-00664-w

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe success of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is predicated on multisectoral collaboration (MSC), and the COVID-19 pandemic makes it more urgent to learn how this can be done better. Complex challenges facing countries, such as COVID-19, cut across health, education, environment, financial and other sectors. Addressing these challenges requires the range of responsible sectors and intersecting services – across health, education, social and financial protection, economic development, law enforcement, among others – transform the way they work together towards shared goals. While the necessity of MSC is recognized, research is needed to understand how sectors collaborate, inform how to do so more efficiently, effectively and equitably, and ascertain similarities and differences across contexts. To answer these questions and inform practice, research to strengthen the evidence-base on MSC is critical.MethodsThis paper draws on a 12-country study series on MSC for health and sustainable development, in the context of the health and rights of women, children and adolescents. It is written by core members of the research coordination and country teams. Issues were analyzed during the study period through ‘real-time’ discussions and structured reporting, as well as through literature reviews and retrospective feedback and analysis at the end of the study.ResultsWe identify four considerations that are unique to MSC research which will be of interest to other researchers, in the context of COVID-19 and beyond: 1) use theoretical frameworks to frame research questions as relevant to all sectors and to facilitate theoretical generalizability and evolution; 2) specifically incorporate sectoral analysis into MSC research methods; 3) develop a core set of research questions, using mixed methods and contextual adaptations as needed, with agreement on criteria for research rigor; and 4) identify shared indicators of success and failure across sectors to assess MSCs.ConclusionIn responding to COVID-19 it is evident that effective MSC is an urgent priority. It enables partners from diverse sectors to effectively convene to do more together than alone. Our findings have practical relevance for achieving this objective and contribute to the growing literature on partnerships and collaboration. We must seize the opportunity here to identify remaining knowledge gaps on how diverse sectors can work together efficiently and effectively in different settings to accelerate progress towards achieving shared goals.

【 授权许可】

CC BY