期刊论文详细信息
International journal of kinesiology and sports science
Effects of Kettlebell Swing vs. Explosive Deadlift Training on Strength and Power
article
Matthew R. Maulit1  David C. Archer1  Whitney D. Leyva1  Cameron N. Munger1  Megan A. Wong1  Lee E. Brown1  Jared W. Coburn1  Andrew J. Galpin1 
[1] Center for Sport Performance and Human Performance Lab, Department of Kinesiology, California State University
关键词: vertical jump;    isometric mid-thigh pull;    hip hinge;   
DOI  :  10.7575//aiac.ijkss.v.5n.1p.1
来源: Australian International Academic Centre PTY. LTD.
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background: Recent research has compared explosive deadlift to kettlebell training observing their effects on strength. The kettlebell swing is a popular practical exercise as it shares share a hip hinge movement with the explosive deadlift, but the two have not been compared. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of kettlebell swing vs. explosive deadlift training on strength and power. Methods: Thirty-one recreationally resistance-trained men (age = 23.1 ± 2.3 years, height = 175.5 ± 6.6 cm, mass = 83.9 ± 13.8 kg, 1RM deadlift = 159.9 ± 31.7 kg) were randomly assigned to one of two groups [kettlebell swing group (KBG) n = 15, or explosive deadlift group (EDLG) n = 16]. Vertical jump height, isometric mid-thigh pull (MTP), and 1RM deadlift were measured pre and post training. Both groups trained twice per week for 4 weeks. Volume and load were increased after the first 2 weeks of training. Results: A 2 (time) x 2 (group) mixed factor ANOVA revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in deadlift 1RM (pre: 159.9 ± 31.7 kg, post: 168.9 ± 31.8 kg) and vertical jump height (pre: 56.6 ± 9.9 cm, post: 57.9 ± 9.7 cm) for both groups, but were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant changes in MTP. Conclusions: Strength and conditioning professionals may use both kettlebell swings and explosive deadlifts to increase deadlift strength and vertical jump power.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202105240000356ZK.pdf 198KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次