Organizational structure, climate, and collaboration between juvenile justice and community mental health centers: implications for evidence-based practice implementation for adolescent substance use disorder treatment

BMC Health Services Research

M. C. Aalsma¹  A. Dir²  M. P. Salyers³  A. Johnson-Kwochka⁴ 

[1] Faculty, Adolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA;Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA;Faculty, Adolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA;Faculty, Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA;Faculty, Psychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN, USA;Psychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN, USA;

关键词: Substance use disorders;    Juvenile justice;    Community mental health;    Implementation barriers;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-020-05777-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundSubstance use disorders are prevalent among youth involved with the criminal justice system, however, evidence-based substance use disorder treatment is often unavailable to this population. The goal of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of evidence-based practices among juvenile justice and community mental health organizations through the lens of an adopter-based innovation model.MethodsIn this mixed-methods study, qualitative interviews were conducted with n = 15 juvenile justice staff and n = 14 community mental health staff from two counties implementing substance use services for justice involved youth. In addition, n = 28 juvenile justice staff and n = 85 community mental health center staff also completed quantitative measures of organizational effectiveness including the implementation leadership scale (ILS), organizational readiness for change (ORIC), and the implementation climate scale (ICS).ResultsOrganizationally, staff from community mental health centers reported more “red tape” and formalized procedures around daily processes, while many juvenile justice staff reported a high degree of autonomy. Community mental health respondents also reported broad concern about their capacity for providing new interventions. Staff across the two different organizations expressed support for evidence-based practices, agreed with the importance of treating substance use disorders in this population, and were enthusiastic about implementing the interventions.ConclusionsWhile both community mental health and juvenile justice staff express commitment to implementing evidence-based practices, systems-level changes are needed to increase capacity for providing evidence-based services.

【 授权许可】

CC BY