Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in giant cell arteritis: a cross-sectional study

Arthritis Research & Therapy

Julia Geiger¹  Frode Lohne²  Geirmund Myklebust³  Andreas P. Diamantopoulos⁴  Wolfgang Andreas Schmidt⁵  Mohammad Bardi⁶  Ashley Yip⁶  Elizabeth Torrey Jernberg⁷ 

[1] Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;Department of Radiology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway;Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway;Department of Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, Norway;Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Medical Center for Rheumatology Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany;University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;University of Washington/Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA;

关键词: Vasculitis;    Giant cell arteritis;    Ultrasound;    Magnetic resonance imaging;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13075-020-02335-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThere has been a shift in recent years to using ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as first-line investigations for suspected cranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and is a new recommendation by the EULAR 2018 guidelines for imaging in LVV. This cross-sectional study compares the performance of US and MRI and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for detecting vasculitis in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).MethodsPatients with new-onset or already diagnosed GCA were recruited. The common temporal arteries and supra-aortic large vessels were evaluated by US and MRI/MRA. Blinded experts read the images and applied a dichotomous score (vasculitis: yes/no) in each vessel.ResultsThirty-seven patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) were recruited. Two patients were excluded. Of the remaining patients, nine had new-onset disease and 26 had established disease. Mean age was 71 years, and median C-reactive protein (CRP) was 7.5 mg/L. The median time between US and MRI was 1 day. Overall, US revealed vasculitic changes more frequently than MRI (p < 0.001). US detected vascular changes in 37% of vessels compared to 21% with MRI. Among patients with chronic disease, US detected vascular changes in 23% of vessels compared to 7% with MRI in (p < 0.001). The same was true for patients with new-onset disease. US detected vasculitic changes in 22% of vessels and MRI detected disease in 6% (p = 0.0004). Compared to contrast-enhanced MRA, US was more sensitive in detecting vasculitic changes in the large arteries, including the axillary, carotid, and subclavian arteries.ConclusionUS more frequently detects vasculitic changes in the large arteries compared to contrast-enhanced MRA. When evaluating the cranial vessels, US performs similarly to MRI. This data supports the recommendation that US be considered as a first-line evaluation in patients suspected to have GCA.

【 授权许可】

CC BY