Monitoring priority substances in biota under the Water Framework Directive: how effective is a tiered approach based on caged invertebrates? A proof-of-concept study targeting PFOS in French rivers

Environmental Sciences Europe

François Lestremau¹  Azziz Assoumani¹  Marc Babut²  Cécile Miege²  Patrick Jame³  Olivier Perceval⁴  Nicolas Hette-Tronquart⁴  Benoit J. D. Ferrari⁵ 

[1] INERIS, Unité Méthodes et développements en Analyses pour l’Environnement, 60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France;INRAE, RIVERLY, 69625, Villeurbanne, France;ISA, Université de Lyon, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280, 5 rue de la Doua, F-69100, Villeurbanne, France;OFB (Office français de la biodiversité, Direction de la Recherche et de l’appui Scientifique), 94300, Vincennes, France;Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Center), EPFL ENAC IIE-GE, Station 2, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland;

关键词: Water Framework Directive;    Chemical status;    Biota;    Monitoring;    Caging;    Gammarus fossarum;    Compliance checking;    Trophic magnification factor;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12302-020-00416-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study aims to describe and test a tiered approach for assessing compliance to Environmental Quality standards (EQSs) for priority substances in biota in line with the European Water Framework Directive. This approach is based on caged gammarids and trophic magnification factors (TMFs) at the first tier, with fish analyzed at the second tier at sites predicted to exceed the EQS at the first tier. A dataset was implemented by monitoring perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in caged gammarids exposed at 15 sites in French rivers, and in fish muscle and rest-of-body from the same sites. Isotopic ratios (δ13C and δ15 N) were also measured in gammarids and fish. Two scenarios were developed to compare measured PFOS concentrations in fish against predicted concentrations based on measures in caged gammarids and TMFs. Scenario (1) compared measured PFOS concentrations in fish fillets with predicted PFOS concentrations based on measured concentrations in caged gammarids and δ15 N. Scenario (2) tested whether or not EQS exceedance was correctly predicted based on measured concentrations in caged gammarids and trophic levels (TLs) from wild fish and gammarid populations.Resultsδ13C and δ15 N variations showed that caged gammarids used local food resources during exposure in the field. PFOS concentrations in gammarids were fairly variable through time at each site. In fish, concentrations ranged from < 1 to 250 ng g−1 (wet weight). After adjustment to the TL at which the EQS is set, 12 sites were above the EQS for PFOS. In scenario (1), predicted concentrations were almost correct at 7 sites out of 15. Most incorrect predictions were overestimations that were slightly improved by applying a lower (neutral) TMF. In scenario (2) we tested several variants for parameters involved in the predictions. The most efficient combination yielded two wrong predictions out of 15. This result was obtained with a higher (more conservative) TMF value, mean concentrations in gammarids from several field exposures during a year, and a TL for gammarids at the median of the distribution in French rivers.ConclusionThe proposed tiered approach was thus efficient. However, the number of sites was relatively limited, and the dataset was biased towards EQS exceedance. The tiered approach warrants further validation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY