Bottom-up and top-down approaches to understanding oppositional defiant disorder symptoms during early childhood: a mixed method study

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

Britt-Marie Ljungström¹  Ulf Axberg²  Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm³ 

[1] Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Box 500, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden;Fakultet for Sosialfag/Faculty of Social Studies, Familieterapi Og Systemisk Praksis/Family Therapy and Systemic Pratice, VID Vitenskapelige høgskole/VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway;Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Box 500, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden;Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Box 400, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden;Research and Development, Skaraborg Hospital, 541 85, Skövde, Sweden;

关键词: Oppositional defiant disorder;    Antisocial behavior;    Mixed methods;    K-SADS;    Bottom–up-top–down;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13034-020-00339-1

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundChildren with clinical levels of conduct problems are at high risk of developing mental health problems such as persistent antisocial behavior or emotional problems in adolescence. Serious conduct problems in childhood also predict poor functioning across other areas of life in early adulthood such as overweight, heavy drinking, social isolation and not in employment or education. It is important to capture those children who are most at risk, early in their development. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5) is commonly used in clinical settings, to identify children with conduct problems such as oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).This paper presents a cross-sectional study in a clinical setting, and describes behaviors in 3- to 8-year-olds with ODD. Our aim was to investigate whether there were problematic behaviors that were not captured by the diagnosis of ODD, using two different methods: a clinical approach (bottom-up) and the nosology for the diagnosis of ODD (top-down).MethodFifty-seven children with clinical levels of ODD participated in the study. The mothers were interviewed with both open questions and with a semi-structured diagnostic interview K-SADS. The data was analyzed using a mixed method, convergent, parallel qualitative/quantitative (QUAL + QUAN) design. For QUAL analysis qualitative content analysis was used, and for QUAN analysis associations between the two data sets, and ages-groups and gender were compared using Chi-square test.ResultsIn the top-down approach, the ODD criteria helped to identify and separate commonly occurring oppositional behavior from conduct problems, but in the bottom-up approach, the accepted diagnostic criteria did not capture the entire range of problematic behaviors-especially those behaviors that constitute a risk for antisocial behavior.ConclusionsThe present study shows a gap between the diagnoses of ODD and conduct disorder (CD) in younger children. Antisocial behaviors manifest in preschool and early school years are not always sufficiently alarming to meet the diagnosis of CD, nor are they caught in their entirety by the ODD diagnostic tool. One way to verify suspicion of early antisocial behavior in preschool children would be to specify in the ODD diagnosis if there also is subclinical CD.

【 授权许可】

CC BY