| International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity | |
| A whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: findings from the families reporting every step to health (FRESH) pilot randomised controlled trial | |
| Claire Hughes1  Francesco Fusco2  Helen Elizabeth Brown3  Justin M. Guagliano3  Esther M. F. van Sluijs3  Katie L. Morton3  Sofie M. Armitage3  Andrew P. Jones4  Emma Coombes4  | |
| [1] Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;MRC Epidemiology Unit and Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;Norwich Medical School and Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; | |
| 关键词: Youth; Parent; Mothers; Fathers; Mums; Dads; Co-participation; Co-physical activity; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12966-020-01025-3 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
IntroductionThis study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of FRESH (Families Reporting Every Step to Health), a theory-based child-led family physical activity (PA) intervention delivered online. We also assessed the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention on outcomes of interest and whether pre-specified criteria were met to progress to a full-scale definitive trial.MethodsIn a three-armed randomised pilot trial, 41 families (with a 7–11-year-old index child) were allocated to a: ‘family’ (FAM), ‘pedometer-only’ (PED), or a no-treatment control (CON) arm. The FAM arm received access to the FRESH website, allowing participants to select step challenges to ‘travel’ to target cities around the world, log their steps, and track progress as families virtually globetrot. FAM and PED arms also received family sets of pedometers. All family members could participate in the evaluation. Physical (e.g., fitness, blood pressure), psychosocial (e.g., social support), behavioural (e.g., objectively-measured PA), and economic (e.g., expenditure for PA) data were collected at baseline, 8- and 52-weeks.ResultsAt 8- and 52-weeks, 98 and 88% of families were retained, respectively. Most children liked participating in the study (> 90%) and thought it was fun (> 80%). Compared to the PED (45%) and CON (39%) arms, a higher percentage of children in the FAM (81%) arm reported doing more activities with their family. Adults agreed that FRESH encouraged their family do more PA and made their family more aware of the amount of PA they do. No notable between-group differences were found for childrens’ minutes in moderate-to-vigorous PA. Sizeable changes of 9.4 (95%CI: 0.4, 18.4) and 15.3 (95%CI: 6.0, 24.5) minutes in moderate-to-vigorous PA was found for adults in the FAM group compared to those in the PED or CON groups, respectively. No other notable differences were found.ConclusionThis study demonstrates feasibility and acceptability of the FRESH intervention. All progression criteria were at least partially satisfied. However, we failed to recruit the target sample size and did not find a signal of effectiveness on PA particularly long-term or in children. Further refinements are required to progress to a full-scale trial.Trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered (ISRCTN12789422) on 16/03/2016.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202104246439924ZK.pdf | 957KB |
PDF