The results of screw augmentation of acetabular cement spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic hip joint infection

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Jing-Yao Jin¹  Taek-Rim Yoon¹  Sheng-Yu Jin¹  Kyung-Soon Park¹  Dong-Min Jung¹  Qing-Song Li² 

[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Joint Disease at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 322, Seo Yang-Ro, Hwasun-Eup, 519-809, Hwasun-Gun, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea;Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Joint Disease, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, China;

关键词: Two stage;    Infection;    Dislodgement;    Screw;    Augmentation;    Stability;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13018-020-01950-w

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

IntroductionProsthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC) is widely used in two-stage revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In our institution, we encountered several cases of acetabular cement spacer dislodgement. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two-stage revision arthroplasties with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers with or without screws on the acetabulum for PJI.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study included 44 patients who underwent a two-stage revision THA for PJI from June 2007 to May 2017. We divided the patients into two groups: group 1 consisted of 21 patients (21 hips) who underwent two-stage revision arthroplasty with screw augmentation, while group 2 consisted of 23 patients (23 hips) who underwent the same surgery without screw augmentation at the acetabular cement spacer. We compared the migration and dislodgement of the acetabular cement spacer between the two groups.ResultsBefore the second-stage surgery, there was less vertical migration of the cement spacer in group 1 compared to group 2 (1.2 mm vs 3.1 mm, p < 0.001). There was also less medial migration of the cement spacer in group 1 (0.6 mm vs 1.6 mm, p = 0.001). After the first stage, the mean Harris Hip score was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (75 vs 65, p = 0.033). Cement spacer rotation or total movement out of the acetabular area occurred in six patients, all in group 2. After first stage reinfection occurred in two patients, one in each group.ConclusionsScrew augmentation to the acetabulum in the first-stage surgery provides better stability of acetabular antibiotic cement spacers without increasing reinfection rate.

【 授权许可】

CC BY