MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications

Research Integrity and Peer Review

Cameron Neylon¹  Martin Paul Eve²  Mohammad Hosseini³  Bert Gordijn³ 

[1] Centre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia;Department of English and Humanities, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK;Institute of Ethics, School of Theology, Philosophy, and Music, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland;

关键词: Inaccurate citations;    Editorial process;    Post-publication peer-review;    Annotations;    Research integrity;    Responsibilities;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s41073-020-00099-8

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundInaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to underreporting, the inability of peer reviewers and editors to detect them, and editors’ reluctance to publish corrections about them. In this paper, we propose a new tool that could be used to tackle their circulation.MethodsWe provide a review of available data about inaccurate citations and analytically explore current ways of reporting and dealing with these inaccuracies. Consequently, we make a distinction between publication (i.e., first occurrence) and circulation (i.e., reuse) of inaccurate citations. Sloppy reading of published items, literature ambiguity and insufficient quality control in the editorial process are identified as factors that contribute to the publication of inaccurate citations. However, reiteration or copy-pasting without checking the validity of citations, paralleled with lack of resources/motivation to report/correct inaccurate citations contribute to their circulation.Results and discussionWe propose the development of an online annotation tool called “MyCites” as means with which to mark and map inaccurate citations. This tool allows ORCID users to annotate citations and alert authors (of the cited and citing articles) and also editors of journals where inaccurate citations are published. Each marked citation would travel with the digital version of the document (persistent identifiers) and be visible on websites that host peer-reviewed articles (journals’ websites, Pubmed, etc.). In the future development of MyCites, challenges such as the conditions of correct/incorrect-ness and parties that should adjudicate that, and, the issue of dealing with incorrect reports need to be addressed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY