期刊论文详细信息
Engenharia Agrícola
Water application uniformity and fertigation in a dripping irrigation set
Adilson L. Borssoi1  Marcio A. Vilas Boas2  Marcelo Reisdörfer1  Ricardo H. Hernández1  Franciele A. C. Follador1 
[1] ,Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáCascavel PR
关键词: emitter;    hydraulic performance;    low head;    drip irrigation;    emissores;    performance hidráulica;    carga hidráulica;    irrigação por gotejamento;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0100-69162012000400011
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the uniformity of distribution coefficient (UDC) and coefficient of variation (CV) of a familiar set of irrigation, classifying it the ASAE standard. The irrigation and fertigation are determined by two methods the KELLER & KARMELI and DENÍCULI . The two experiments were subjected to varying pressures: 12, 14, 16 and 18 kPa, in a completely randomized design of twenty samples composed of flows with three replications. Urea, potassium chloride (KCl) and ammonium phosphate (MAP) were the elements used for fertigation. The system consisted of a 200 L tank, which supplied another container of 30 L, it was moved vertically to control the pressure. The data was statistically compared between treatments for each methodology. In fertigation the best pressure was 16 kPa and was classified as "excellent" for UDC (91.03%) and "marginal" for C.V. (7.47%). For the irrigation treatment, the best pressure was 16 kPa rated "excellent" for UDC (91.2%) and "marginal" for C.V. (7.68%). The DENÍCULI et al. (1980) methodology proved more reliable for the evaluation of drip systems. It was observed that this set has good uniformity of distribution, but with great variability in flows.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202103040067957ZK.pdf 213KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:18次