期刊论文详细信息
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
Field evaluation of the whole blood immunochromatographic test for rapid bancroftian filariasis diagnosis in the northeast of Brazil
Cynthia Braga2  Maria Inês Dourado1  Ricardo Arraes De A. Ximenes1  Luiz Alves2  Fabio Brayner2  Abraham Rocha2  Neal Alexander1 
[1] ,Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães Recife Pernambuco ,Brazil
关键词: Bancroftian filariasis;    Diagnostic;    Screening;    Surveillance;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0036-46652003000300002
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

This study evaluated the whole blood immunochromatographic card test (ICT card test) in a survey performed in Northeastern Brazil. 625 people were examined by the thick blood film (TBF) and ICT card test. Residents of a non-endemic area were also tested by the whole blood card test and Og4C3. The sensitivity of the ICT card test was 94.7% overall, but lower in females than males, based on the reasonable assumption that TBF is 100% specific. However, since TBF and other methods have unknown sensitivity, the true specificity of the card test is unknown. Nevertheless, it is possible to estimate upper and lower limits for the specificity, and relate it to the prevalence of the disease. In the endemic area, the possible range of the specificity was from 72.4% to 100%. 29.6% of the card tests performed in the non-endemic area exhibited faint lines that were interpreted as positives. Characteristics of the method including high sensitivity, promptness and simplicity justify its use for screening of filariasis. However, detailed information about the correct interpretation in case of extremely faint lines is essential. Further studies designed to consider problems arising from imperfect standards are necessary, as is a sounder diagnostic definition for the card test.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202103040033096ZK.pdf 124KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次