期刊论文详细信息
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Agreement between optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography in post-cataract surgery cystoid macular edema
Somaia Mitne2  Augusto Paranhos Júnior1  Ana Paula Silvério Rodrigues1  Tércio Guia1  Arnaldo Bordon1  Nilva Simeren Bueno De Moraes1  Michel Eid Farah1  Pedro Paulo Bonomo1 
[1] ,Universidade Federal de São Paulo Pronto Socorro de Oftalmologia
关键词: Macular edema;    cystoid;    Cataract extraction;    Fluorescein angiography;    Tomography;    Comparative study;    Edema macular cistóide;    Extração de catarata;    Angiofluoresceinografia;    Tomografia;    Estudo comparativo;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S0004-27492003000700007
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) regarding the detection of cystoid macular edema (CME) following cataract surgery. METHODS: Retrospective comparative observational series of 25 eyes with suspected CME. Patients with low visual acuity and alterations in fundus biomicroscopy after cataract surgery underwent OCT scanning followed by FFA on the same visit. The diagnosis of CME was established considering fluorescein leakage on FFA and retinal thickness and/or cystoid spaces and/or subretinal fluid on OCT. RESULTS: Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients were enrolled. Twenty-two eyes had similar results on both OCT and FFA, of which 15 eyes had CME and 7 eyes had no CME. Two eyes had CME detected only by FFA and one eye only by OCT. The agreement between the two examinations was good (Kappa = 0.7331; p=0.0001) with no tendency to have neither more positive nor negative findings (p=1.0). CONCLUSION: According to these preliminary data, OCT seems to be as effective as FFA to detect CME with a good agreement between the two techniques.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202103040002081ZK.pdf 191KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:4次