期刊论文详细信息
Biota Neotropica
Ecomorphological differences between Rhamdia (Bleeker, 1858) populations from the Iguaçu River basin
Fabio Teruo Mise1  Luiz Fernando Caserta Tencatt1  Fagner De Souza1 
关键词: endemism;    Heptapteridae;    Rhamdia voulezi;    Rhamdia branneri;    Rhamdia quelen;    ecomorphology;    endemismo;    Heptapteridae;    Rhamdia voulezi;    Rhamdia branneri;    Rhamdia quelen;    ecomorfologia;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1676-06032013000400010
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Morphological and genetic evidences suggest that Rhamdia branneri and Rhamdia voulezi, currently considered synonymous of Rhamdia quelen, are in fact two valid species. Furthermore, in the taxonomic revision of R. quelen, no exemplars from the Iguaçu River were examined, which makes the synonymy doubtful. Considering the two species as valid, it was hypothesized that R. branneri and R. voulezi have ecomorphological differences, with the objective to verify if they can be considered ecologically distinct. Ecomorphological characterization was conducted using ecomorphological indices. For statistical analysis, a Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a Multiresponse Permutation Procedure (MRPP), and a Discriminant Analysis (DA) were performed. The ordination provided by the PCA evidenced ecomorphological separation, with R. branneri having morphological aspects related to benthic fishes, and R. voulezi having morphological characteristics related to pelagic and lentic habitats. The DA results confirmed the morphological tendencies found in the PCA, and the MRPP showed significant statistical differences between the ecomorphology of Rhamdia species. In this way, the initial hypothesis can be corroborated. These results allied to information about diet, genetics, and reproduction can be helpful for the elucidation of the taxonomic status of R. branneri and R. voulezi.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130174544ZK.pdf 490KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:25次