期刊论文详细信息
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
Comparison of primers for RAPD-PCR from environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus albidus and Cryptococcus laurentii complex
Reginaldo Dos Santos Pedroso2  Joseane Cristina Ferreira1  Karen Regina Carim Da Costa1  Regina Celia Candido1 
[1] ,Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Escola Técnica de Saúde Uberlândia MG ,Brasil
关键词: Cryptococcus albidus;    Cryptococcus laurentii;    RAPD;    Molecular Markers;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1517-83822012000300015
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Various organisms have been characterized by molecular methods, including fungi of the genus Cryptococcus. The purposes of this study were: to determine the discriminatory potential of the RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA) primers, the pattern of similarity of the Cryptococcus species, and discuss their useful application in epidemiological studies. We analyzed 10 isolates of each specie/group: C. albidus, C. laurentii complex, C. neoformans var. grubii, all from environmental source, and two ATCC strains, C. neoformans var. grubii ATCC 90112, and C. neoformans var. neoformans ATCC 28957 by RAPD-PCR using the primers CAV1, CAV2, ZAP19, ZAP20, OPB11 and SEQ6. The primers showed a good discriminatory power, revealing important differences between them and between species; the SEQ6 primer discriminated a larger number of isolates of three species. Isolates of C. laurentii showed greater genetic diversity than other species revealed by all six primers. Isolates of C. neoformans were more homogeneous. Only the primer CAV2 showed no amplification of DNA bands for C. albidus. It was concluded that the use of limited number of carefully selected primers allowed the discrimination of different isolates, and some primers (e.g., CAV2 for C. albidus) may not to be applied to some species.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130168394ZK.pdf 330KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:10次