期刊论文详细信息
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
Evaluation of the Diramic system for urine cultures
Cristian Kendi Higuchi2  Carlos Roberto Corrêa1  Vera Lucia Mores Rall2  Ary Fernandes Junior2 
[1] ,Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Microbiologia e ImunologiaBotucatu SP ,Brasil
关键词: Diramic;    calibrated loop;    urinary tract infection;    urine cultures;    sistema Diramic;    alça calibrada;    ITU;    urinoculturas;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1517-83822006000300005
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The use of the Diramic system in microbiological diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) was evaluated. This system was developed at the National Center for Scientific Research of Cuba, and it reads turbidimetric changes of microbial growth in culture media at 37ºC incubated for 4 hours. A total of 396 urine specimens were tested in the Laboratory of Microbiology of the School of Medicine - UNESP, Brazil using the Diramic system and the counting of colony forming units per urine millimeter (calibrated loop) as the reference method. The coincidence rate between the two methods was 96.46% (382 urine samples), and the differences in results were not significant (p<0.05). Sensitivity and specificity rates were 84.37% and 98.80%, respectively. False negative and false positive rates were 2.50% and 1.01%, respectively. The microorganisms isolated from positive urines were: Escherichia coli (68.75%); Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.94%); yeast (6.25%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.69%); Enterobacter cloacae (3.12%); Proteus mirabilis, coagulase negative Staphylococcus, Morganella morganii, and Citrobacter freundii (1.56% each). The Diramic system was effective as screening method for urine cultures, however restrictions in the UTI diagnosis caused by yeasts and patients undergoing antibiotic therapy were negative characteristics of the system.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130167439ZK.pdf 991KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:5次