期刊论文详细信息
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
An adaptation of the Interpersonal Problem Areas Rating Scale: pilot and interrater agreement study
Ana Claudia Fontes De Andrade1  Ellen Frank2  Francisco Lotufo Neto1  Patricia R Houck2 
[1] ,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Western Psychiatric Institute and ClinicUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburg ,USA
关键词: Psychotherapy;    Interpersonal relations;    Problems and exercises;    Imagery;    Scales;    Psicoterapia;    Relações interpessoais;    Problemas e exercícios;    Imagens;    Escalas;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1516-44462008000400010
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the adaptation of a rating scale of interpersonal psychotherapy problem areas to include a fifth problem area appropriate to bipolar disorder and an interrater agreement study in identifying interpersonal problem areas and selecting a primary treatment focus if patients were to engage in treatment. METHOD: Five research interpersonal psychotherapists assessed nine audiotapes of a single interview with five bipolar and four unipolar patients in which the interpersonal inventory and identification of problem areas were undertaken. RESULTS: Raters agreed on presence and absence of problem areas in seven tapes. Kappas for identification of problem areas were 1.00 (grief), 0.77 (role dispute), 0.61 (role transition), 0.57 (interpersonal deficits) and 1.00 (loss of healthy self). Kappa for agreement on a primary clinical focus if patients were to engage in interpersonal psychotherapy treatment was 0.64. CONCLUSIONS: The adaptation of the original scale to include an area pertinent to bipolar disorder proved to be applicable and relevant for use with this population. The results show substantial interrater agreement in identifying problem areas and potential treatment focus.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130161849ZK.pdf 361KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:10次