期刊论文详细信息
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Comparison of Brazilian and American norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)
Rafaela Larsen Ribeiro1  Sabine Pompéia1  Orlando Francisco Amodeo Bueno1 
[1] ,Universidade Federal de São Paulo Department of Psychobiology São Paulo SP ,Brazil
关键词: Expressed emotion;    Pattern recognition;    Recognition (Psychology);    Visual perception;    Form perception;    Projective techniques;    Cross-cultural comparison;    Sex characteristics;    Emoções manifestas;    Reconhecimento visual de modelos;    Recognição (psicologia);    Percepção visual;    Percepção de forma;    Técnicas projetivas;    Comparação transcultural;    Características sexuais;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1516-44462005000300009
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVE: The present article compares Brazilian and American norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), a set of normative emotional photographic slides for experimental investigations. METHODS: Subjects were 1,062 Brazilian university students (364 men and 698 women) who rated 707 pictures from the IAPS in terms of pleasure, arousal, and dominance following the methodology of the original normative study in the US, enabling direct comparison of data from the two samples through Pearson product moment correlation and Student t test. RESULTS: All correlations were highly significant with the highest level for the pleasure dimension, followed by dominance and arousal. However, contrary to the American normative values, our data showed that Brazilian subjects generally assigned higher arousal ratings overall. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that this set of stimuli can be used in Brazil as an affective rating tool due to the high correlations found across the two populations, despite differences on the arousal dimension, which are discussed in detail.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130161484ZK.pdf 653KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:35次 浏览次数:19次