期刊论文详细信息
Materials Research
Effect of different finishing: polishing systems on the surface roughness of two heat-treated composite resins
Gabrielle Ribeiro Lima2  Nathalia Cardoso Baima Maluf2  Soraia De Fátima Carvalho Souza2  Antonio Ernandes Macedo Paiva1  Erick Miranda Souza1  Ivone Lima Santana2 
[1] ,Federal University of Maranhão School of Dentistry São Luís MA ,Brazil
关键词: composite resins;    dental polishing;    heat treatment;   
DOI  :  10.1590/S1516-14392011005000027
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The aim of this study was to compare the surface roughness achieved by different finishing/polishing systems on two composite resins for direct use after thermic treatment. The specimens (n = 40 per group (G); G1 = Filtek™ P60; G2 = Fill Magic®) were set up on a matrix of stainless steel with circular internal niches (Ø = 10.0 mm; h = 2.0 mm). Next, they were subjected to thermal treatment in a heated chamber at 170 °C for 10 minutes. They were then divided randomly into four subgroups (Sg) to receive the surface treatment according to the finishing/polishing systems tested (n = 10): Sg A: Control; Sg B: Diamond® felt disc + Diamond Excel® diamond paste; Sg C: Sof-Lex® discs; and Sg D: Enhance™ silicon tips. The mean roughness (Ra) was determined using a digital surface roughnes tester. Data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Differences between the surface treatments were found on both resins (p < 0.05). In G1, the lowest mean Ra values were observed using Sg C (0.07 μm) and the highest for Sg D (0.12 μm) (p < 0.05). There was no difference between Sg B (0.08 μm) and Sg C (0.07 μm) (p = 0.076). In G2, there was a progressive increase in mean Ra values from Sg D (0.05 μm) to Sg C (0.06 μm) and to Sg B (0.07 μm) (p < 0.05). It was concluded that the finishing/polishing systems modified Ra on both resins.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130152626ZK.pdf 218KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:7次