期刊论文详细信息
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
Adherence to standard precautions from the standpoint of the Health Belief Model: the practice of recapping needles
Ronald Jefferson Martins1  Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz1  Maria Lúcia Marçal Mazza Sundefeld1  Artênio José Ísper Garbin1  Patrick Raphael Vicente Gonçalves1  Cléa Adas Saliba Garbin1 
关键词: Occupational risks;    Universal precautions;    Human resources in health;    Health education;    Riscos ocupacionais;    Precauções universais;    Recursos humanos em saúde;    Educação em saúde;   
DOI  :  10.1590/1413-81232014201.19822013
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The aim of this study was to applythe Health Belief Model to explain the adherence to the recommendation not to recap needles by dentists and dental assistants of the public health system in a municipality in the State of São Paulo. A questionnaire validated and adapted for the oral health area was used, which included variables related to the frequency of recapping and health beliefs using Likert-type scales. The relationship between beliefs and adherence to the recommendation not to recap needles was obtained by regression analysis. Of all the professionals in this study (n=79), the majority (83.5%) reported recapping needles at least once in the last month. Through regression analysis, it was observed that the relationship between the beliefs described by the model and the attitude whether or not to follow the recommendation not to recap needles was explained by a lower perception of psychological barriers and a greater perception of stimuli not to recap needles. The conclusion reached is that the acceptance of recommendations to prevent working accidents with biological material was explained by some dimensions of the Health Belief Model, enabling discussion about reformulation of training offered to professionals of the public health system.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130143053ZK.pdf 83KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:19次 浏览次数:16次