期刊论文详细信息
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
The development of a risk score for unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns
Priscila Costa1  Amélia Fumiko Kimura1  Debra Huffman Brandon1  Eny Dorea Paiva1  Patricia Ponce De Camargo1 
关键词: Catheterization;    Central Venous;    Risk Factors;    Infant;    Newborn;    Neonatal Nursing;    Cateterismo Venoso Central;    Fatores de Risco;    Recém-Nascido;    Enfermagem Neonatal;    Cateterismo Venoso Central;    Factores de Riesgo;    Recién Nacido;    Enfermería Neonatal;   
DOI  :  10.1590/0104-1169.0491.2578
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVE: to develop a risk score for unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns.METHOD: prospective cohort study conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit with newborn babies who underwent 524 catheter insertions. The clinical characteristics of the newborn, catheter insertion and intravenous therapy were tested as risk factors for the unplanned removal of catheters using bivariate analysis. The risk score was developed using logistic regression. Accuracy was internally validated based on the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve.RESULTS: the risk score was made up of the following risk factors: transient metabolic disorders; previous insertion of catheter; use of a polyurethane double-lumen catheter; infusion of multiple intravenous solutions through a single-lumen catheter; and tip in a noncentral position. Newborns were classified into three categories of risk of unplanned removal: low (0 to 3 points), moderate (4 to 8 points), and high (≥ 9 points). Accuracy was 0.76.CONCLUSION: the adoption of evidence-based preventative strategies based on the classification and risk factors faced by the newborn is recommended to minimize the occurrence of unplanned removals.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130123018ZK.pdf 370KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:12次