Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia | |
The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process | |
Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque1  | |
[1] ,Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Departamento de Biologia Laboratório de Etnobotânica AplicadaRecife PE ,Brazil | |
关键词: Ethics in science; science philosophy; scientific writing; | |
DOI : 10.1590/S0102-695X2011005000036 | |
来源: SciELO | |
【 摘 要 】
The peer review process is the dominant system adopted in science to evaluate the quality of articles submitted for publication. Various social players are involved in this process, including authors, editors and reviewers. Much has been discussed about the need to improve the scientific quality of what is published. The main focus of these discussions has been the work of the authors. However, the editors and reviewers also fulfill an important role. In this opinion article, we discuss some proposals to improve the peer review system, emphasizing the role of reviewers and editors.
【 授权许可】
CC BY-NC-ND
All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202005130096410ZK.pdf | 653KB | download |