期刊论文详细信息
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Bankart arthroscopic procedure: comparative study on use of double or single-thread anchors after a 2-year follow-up
Glaydson Gomes Godinho1  José Márcio Alves Freitas1  Flávio De Oliveira França1  Flávio Márcio De Lago E Santos1  Alan Arruda Aragão1  Marcos Knoll Barros1 
关键词: Joint instability;    Shoulder dislocation/epidemiology;    Shoulder dislocation/surgery;    Instabilidade articular;    Luxação do ombro/epidemiologia;    Luxação do ombro/cirurgia;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.rboe.2014.12.006
来源: SciELO
PDF
【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of anchors with double and single-thread loading in the single-row Bankart arthroscopic procedure.METHODS: 252 patients (258 shoulders) underwent Bankart arthroscopic surgery with evaluation after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. They underwent repairs either using anchors with single loading of a high-resistance non-absorbable braided thread (206 shoulders; group AS) or using double loading of thread with the same characteristics (52 shoulders; group AD). The patients were evaluated using the UCLA and Carter-Rowe scales. The patients' return to sports activity and recurrences were also compared.RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the surgical failure rate (group AS 5.8%; group AD 7.7%; p = 0.62). Group AS presented a better mean Carter-Rowe score (group AS 94.4; group AD 88.6; p < 0.05) and greater return to the same sports level (group AS 79.1; group AD 72.1; p < 0.05).CONCLUSION: Use of anchors with double thread loading did not show any clinical advantage for arthroscopic repair of traumatic anterior shoulder instability, in relation to use of single-thread anchors, over a 2-year follow-up.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC-ND   
 All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202005130094691ZK.pdf 1158KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:3次